Ƶ

Huntington's Disease Updates

Ƶ MedicalToday

In Early-Stage Huntington’s Disease, Cognitive Trajectories Vary

—In a study of adults with early or early-mid Huntington’s disease, two types of patients emerged: those with a mild, slow progression of cognitive decline and those marked by a more rapid and aggressive decline. How did these groups compare with healthy controls?

People with Huntington’s disease may exhibit subtle cognitive changes up to 15 years prior to receiving a motor-based diagnosis. Although cytosine-adenine-guanine (CAG) repeat length is associated with the presentation and progression of cognitive impairment in Huntington’s disease, the timing and pattern of cognitive decline can vary greatly between patients, even in individuals of a similar age, stage of disease, education level, and CAG repeat length.1

With these facts in mind, researchers in Spain conducted a study to determine whether there are different cognitive phenotypes present during the earlier stages of Huntington’s disease, and, if so, to characterize their contributing clinical and sociodemographic variables.1

image

Huntington’s patients are matched to healthy controls

Data were obtained from the longitudinal, observational, multinational Enroll-HD study.1 Participants were between the ages of 21 and 60 years at diagnosis or at first symptom manifestation, had early or early-mid Huntington’s disease, and had between 40 and 55 CAG repeats.

The study population included 528 participants with Huntington’s disease. They were matched to 566 healthy controls with a CAG length <27 who were either gene-negative relatives or healthy controls with similar sociodemographic characteristics to those of the participants with Huntington’s disease. At baseline, the mean age of the Huntington’s disease group was 49.5 (standard deviation [SD] 10.1) years, mean CAG repeat length was 43.7 (SD 3.1), mean age at onset was 43.9 (SD 9.0) years, and mean duration of disease was 5.45 (SD 4.20) years.

Two cohorts, with different rates of decline, are identified

Two main groups of Huntington’s patients were revealed by cluster analysis: one with a relatively benign, slow profile of cognitive progression (S-CogHD; n=293) and the other with a faster or more aggressive pattern of cognitive decline (F-CogHD; n=235).1 The only difference between the two groups at baseline was a Unified Huntington’s Disease Rating Scale–Total Motor Score that was 3.88 points higher in the F-CogHD group (t528=3.39; P<.005) than in the S-CogHD group.

The F-CogHD group demonstrated a significant pattern of decline in Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores at 12 months (t235=7.7) and at 36 months (t235=6.1), as well as between baseline and 36 months (t235=14.9; P<.001 for all). By comparison, MMSE scores remained stable over time in the S-CogHD group.

Both groups exhibited a pattern of significant decline in Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) performance between visits; however, the pattern was more pronounced in the F-CogHD group between baseline and 12 months (t235=9.89), between 12 and 24 months (t235=6.35), between 24 and 36 months (t235=10.39), and between baseline and 36 months (t235=24.2; P<.001 for all).

Similarly, although the pattern of decline in Stroop word-reading test results was significant in both groups, this pattern was more pronounced in the F-CogHD group between baseline and 12 months (t235=9.98), at 24 months (t235=7.11), at 36 months (t235=9.37), and between baseline and 36 months (t235=24.35; P<.001 for all).

How participants and controls measured up

An exploratory analysis revealed two main groups of healthy controls. The first group (n=135) was slightly older (t566=1.19; P=.048), had lower baseline SDMT scores (t566=–2.18; P<.05), and had higher MMSE scores (t566=7.45; P<.001) than the second group (n=431). In this case, advanced age and lower performance scores at baseline were able to explain the healthy controls’ differing progression patterns.

On the other hand, the two distinct cognitive phenotypes uncovered among the participants with Huntington’s disease in this study were not explained by the effects of CAG repeat length, age, disease duration, or other core clinical characteristics at baseline. These phenotypes—marked by slow annual declines in cognition and function in the S-CogHD group and a significantly more aggressive progression pattern in the F-CogHD group—did not appear among healthy controls.

The study authors concluded that Huntington’s disease “can be associated with very different cognitive trajectories in terms of progression over 3 years. Therefore, we must go deeper in identifying the mechanisms that could contribute to this cognitive heterogeneity, and we must emphasize the need to assume the existence of multiple possible phenotypes, forms of presentation, and progression of the disease, as has already been evidenced in other neurodegenerative processes.”1

Published:

Cheryl Zigrand is a freelance medical writer who writes across multiple disease states, including oncology, dermatology, and rheumatology. She is based in Brooklyn, N.Y.

References

image
Juvenile-Onset Huntington’s Disease: A More Nuanced Approach to Monitoring Progression
This study identified specific motor skills as highly sensitive markers of juvenile-onset Huntington’s disease (JOHD) progression, offering more precise tools for tracking the disease and designing future treatments tailored to patients with JOHD.
image
In Huntington’s Disease, Exploring the Roles of Race, Ethnicity, and Education
A study identified racial and ethnic disparities in Huntington’s disease, as well as differences based on levels of education of patients, finding that minority patients may be disproportionately affected.
image
Neurogenetic Disease Patients and Caregivers May Benefit from End-of-Life Conversations
A French study based on questionnaires and interviews showed a willingness among patients with neurogenetic diseases and their primary caregivers to talk about sensitive issues like advance directives and end-of-life care.
image
In Huntington’s Disease, Depression is Different
Investigators call for psychosocial interventions in those with or at risk for Huntington’s disease. Taking a personalized approach to address factors such as concern for the future and sleep disturbances is essential.
image
Are Movement Disorders to Blame for a Lack of Social Awareness?
An examination of 50 relevant studies found that individuals with any of four major types of hyperkinetic movement disorders consistently exhibited impaired social cognition. What does this mean for them—and the professionals who care for them?
image
Huntington’s Disease: A Look at the Global Pace
This updated systematic review and meta-analysis—the first in at least a decade—analyzed rates of this rare inherited neurological disorder in 21 countries, across multiple continents. Have rates gone up, down, or stayed the same?